CF Benchmarks
CF benchmarks logo

Jan 26, 2026

Weekly Index Highlights, January 26, 2026

Market Performance Update

Digital assets reversed sharply week-on-week (w/w) with every CME CF Single Asset Series benchmark declining between -4.0% and -8.9%. Bitcoin fell -4.7% w/w, trimming its year-to-date (YTD) tally even further to just +0.7%, while Ether dropped -8.9% (YTD -1.8%), leaving ETH underperforming BTC by -4.2 percentage points (pp) on the week. Among higher-beta majors, Cardano was the relative ‘defensive’ in a down tape, at -4.0% w/w (+2.3% YTD), while XRP also held within the upper end of the weekly loss band, with -4.7% w/w to stand +1.7% YTD. At the other end of the distribution, Ether was the laggard at -8.9%, reinforcing the notion that the drawdown was not merely a broad risk-off move but also a repricing of platform-beta. The swings versus the prior Weekly Index Highlights edition are material: BTC moved from +4.2% to -4.7% (a -9.0 pp shift), and ETH moved from +7.0% to -8.9% (a -15.9 pp shift). Unfortunately for near-term sentiment, these are consistent with an abrupt compression of risk appetite, much more than a marginal drift lower.

Volatility Analysis

Bitcoin volatility declined Monday 19th through Friday 23rd, possibly reflecting a spillover effect from that Monday being a traditional market holiday, but certainly reflective of the fact that this stretch omits the outbreak of a fresh downdraft over the most recent weekend’s trading. The CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index – Settlement (BVXS) fell from 41.74 to 38.82, a -2.92 vol. point move, with the path printing consistently lower each session, and the largest step-down into Friday (-1.49 points from Thursday to Friday). BTC realized volatility also eased, from 30.46 to 28.45 (-2.01 vol points), with most of the decline front-loaded earlier in the week (down ~2.01 points by Thursday, then essentially flat into Friday). The implied–realized spread therefore narrowed from 11.28 to 10.37 (-0.91 vol points): implied risk premia remained positive, but they compressed as implied softened slightly more than realized over the window. In levels, both metrics sit near the lower end of their trailing 12-month ranges (BVX 34.77–61.16; realized 23.86–64.43), reinforcing that, despite the broader market drawdown, volatility pricing remained comparatively subdued into the Friday close.

Market Cap Index Performance

Capitalization indices traded with unusually tight co-movement, with weekly returns clustered in a -5.88% to -5.33% band (0.55 pp of dispersion). The CF Ultra Cap 5 fell -5.37% w/w (YTD +0.45%), while the free-float market-cap-weighted CF Large Cap declined -5.36% w/w (YTD +0.45%) and the CF Broad Cap Index (Free Float Market Cap Weight) fell -5.33% w/w (YTD +0.42%). The CF Institutional Digital Asset Index posted -5.36% w/w (YTD +0.44%), aligning closely with the large-cap complex, while diversified-weight indices leaned marginally weaker, with the CF Broad Cap (Diversified Weight) down -5.73% w/w (YTD +0.22%) and the CF Large Cap (Diversified Weight) down -5.88% w/w (-0.27% YTD). The near-parallelism of weekly returns indicates that the sell-off was expressed more as a market-wide risk reduction than as a strong internal rotation across capitalization tiers, even though ETH’s -8.9% w/w fall (see Market Performance Update above) suggests some differentiation persisted at the single-asset level.

Factors Analysis

Factor performance showed moderate dispersion over the week, led by a clear upside in Downside Beta alongside broadly negative prints across most other factors. Downside Beta rose +2.74% on a weekly compounded basis, while Liquidity slipped -0.14% and Value edged lower at -0.08%. Momentum and Size declined -0.34% and -0.20%, respectively, and Growth was the laggard at -0.72%. The spread between best and worst factors was therefore 3.46 pp (Downside Beta +2.74% versus Growth -0.72%), indicating rotation. Versus the prior edition, Downside Beta moved from -0.21% to +2.74% (+2.95 pp), while Size swung from +1.12% to -0.20% (-1.32 pp). These moves are consistent with a week that rewarded defensive exposure while compressing the contribution from “size” leadership.

Classification Series Analysis

The Classification Series indices echoed the sector-level de-risking, with all three composites negative and the spread between best and worst at 3.2 pp. The CF Digital Culture Composite Index declined -3.1% w/w, the CF DeFi Composite Index fell -4.6% w/w, and the CF Web 3.0 Smart Contract Platforms Index moved lower by -6.3% w/w. The ordering matters: culture-related exposures were comparatively resilient versus DeFi and platform-beta, which tended to sit closer to the lower end of the weekly loss range, consistent with the single-asset picture where ETH underperformed BTC by -4.2 pp. The change versus the prior edition is stark across the board: Digital Culture shifted from +9.9% to -3.1% (a -13.0 pp swing), DeFi from +2.4% to -4.6% (-7.1 pp), and Smart Contract Platforms from +1.9% to -6.3% (-8.2 pp). Taken together, the classification results point to a week where investors paid a larger penalty for complexity and platform-beta than for consumer-facing exposure.

Sector Analysis

CF DACS sector averages also rotated decisively lower, with the best-performing sector still negative: The Culture Sub-Category averaged -2.4% w/w, compared with Infrastructure at -6.0% w/w, producing a cross-sector spread of 3.6 pp. Finance averaged -4.0% and Non-Programmable averaged -3.5%, while Programmable and Utility sat deeper in the drawdown at -5.1% and -5.7%, respectively, indicating that the week’s risk-off impulse was broad but not uniform. Dispersion was more visible at the constituent level: AXS (Culture, Gaming Segment) gained +23.2% w/w even as the overall sector averaged -2.4%, while ICP (Programmable, General Purpose Smart Contract Platforms) fell -14.8% w/w. Relative to the prior edition, Culture moved from +11.6% to -2.4% (a -14.0 pp swing), underscoring how quickly high-beta leadership can unwind once the tape turns.

CF Staking Series

Staking series performance was mixed on a token basis, while reward rates showing measured but meaningful intra-week repricing. On staking total returns, NEAR was the only positive at +1.11% w/w, while ETH and SOL declined -1.34% and -1.19% w/w, and APT and AVAX were modestly negative at -0.15% and -0.31% w/w. Reward-rate levels ended the week at 5.62% for SOL, 5.46% for AVAX, 4.57% for NEAR, 4.98% for APT and 2.56% for ETH. Intra-week (January 19th to January 25th) changes were as follows: NEAR’s reward rate widened by +5.03 bps, while SOL compressed by -6.79 bps, ETH by -3.47 bps, AVAX by -1.69 bps and APT by -0.75 bps. The cross-asset reward-rate dispersion in that intra-week move is therefore 11.82 bps (from +5.03 to -6.79), signaling a week where yield dynamics were not fully synchronized even as price action was broadly risk-off.

Interest Rate Analysis

The BIRC curves repriced in opposite directions across BTC and USDT, widening the funding differential. On BTC, SIRB printed 6.43% (down -135 bps versus the prior edition), while 1W printed 1.17% (down -30 bps) and 1M printed 1.00%, producing a steep front-end dislocation where SIRB sits 526 bps above 1W. Longer tenors also moved lower, with declines of roughly -70 bps to -106 bps across 2M to 5M. In contrast, the USDT curve shifted materially higher: 1W ended at 4.07% (up +98 bps) and 1M at 4.17% (up +101 bps), leaving the 1M point about 9.7 bps above 1W and indicating a modestly upward-sloping short end. The 1W USDT–BTC differential widened to 290 bps, a +128 bps expansion versus the prior edition. This is consistent with tighter stablecoin funding conditions even as BTC funding rates eased across the curve.


The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.


Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.


Conviction in the Crossfire: Geopolotical Risk, Regulatory Breakthroughs, and the Bitcoin Catch-Up Trade

The Iran conflict has reshaped the macro landscape, stalling the Fed's easing cycle and neutralizing the fiscal impulse. Yet the regulatory environment has never been more constructive, and Bitcoin's catch-up trade with gold has deepened to its most attractive entry point in over two years.

Gabriel Selby
Gabriel Selby

Gabriel Selby

18 mins read
War, the Fed, and a Market on Edge

Our market recap offers a concise overview of key blockchain categories and their recent price action within the broader market context, providing valuable insights for investors and industry practitioners.

Gabriel Selby
Gabriel Selby

Gabriel Selby

5 mins read
Weekly Index Highlights, March 30, 2026

Digital assets fell for a third week, though selling eased. Mega-cap indices like the Ultra Cap 5 (-6.7%) outperformed altcoin-heavy counterparts, with the Diversified Large Cap Index at -7.4%, highlighting continued investor preference for large caps amid broad weakness.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

8 mins read

Footer

Subscribe to our newsletter

The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly.

By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already subscribed? Manage your preferences

© 2026 CF Benchmarks Ltd. All rights reserved.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.

By clicking Accept, you consent to CF Benchmarks's use of cookies.

Visit Cookie Settings to learn how CF Benchmarks uses cookies and to adjust your preferences.