CF Benchmarks
CF benchmarks logo

Mar 09, 2026

Weekly Index Highlights, March 9, 2026

Market Performance Update

Bitcoin captured the tone of market tension in reaction to continuing geopolitical turmoil by closing the most recent week down 2.1%, leaving it down 23.5% for the year to date (YTD), while Ether lost 4.5% week-on-week (w/w) for a 34.9% YTD decline. Likewise, XRP lost a moderate -3.8%, but the pressure clearly increased further down the market cap stack: Avalanche (AVAX) fell 4.7%, Chainlink (LINK) 5.5% and Solana 6.5%. Cardano (ADA) was the clear laggard at -12.0% on the week, leaving its weekly drawdown 9.9 percentage points wider than Bitcoin’s. The group therefore ran from -2.1% to -12.0% w/w, with the three best outcomes all sitting in Bitcoin, XRP and Ether, while the two weakest sat in Solana and Cardano. That 9.9 percentage point spread points to a defensive pecking order inside a negative tape. Lower-beta, more liquid exposure lost 2.1% to 4.5%, while higher-beta layer-1 and alt exposure lost 4.7% to 12.0%. YTD readings tell the same story: Ether at -34.9% and Solana at -34.1% remain deeper in drawdown than Bitcoin at -23.5%.

Volatility Analysis

Bitcoin volatility moved higher through the business week, with our CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index - Settlement (BVXS) benchmark up 1.70 vol. points for the intraweek stretch and realized volatility up 5.80 vol. points. By the Friday close, realized volatility was 5.69 vol. points above BVXS, compared with a gap of 1.03 vol. points a week earlier, on February 27th, when BVXS stood at 53.55, and realized volatility at 54.58. The spread therefore widened by 4.66 vol. points further into negative territory over the week. So, the options market did reprice higher by 1.70 points, but spot outcomes moved 5.80 points, which left options trailing realized conditions. When implied volatility rises 1.70 points and realized volatility rises 5.80 points in the same window, the cleanest read is that spot conditions became more unstable faster than options prices adjusted, potentially indicating more of a wait-and-see stance among risk traders than in the broader Bitcoin market.

Market Cap Index Performance

Market-cap benchmarks also remained under pressure, but the drawdown turned out to be fairly tight across the complex at 2.7% to 4.0%. CF Ultra Cap 5 fell 2.7% w/w, and the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index fell 2.8%, while CF Large Cap and CF Broad Cap in free-float form lost 2.8% and 2.9%. Diversified-weight versions were weaker at 3.8% and 4.0% for Large Cap and Broad Cap. The full weekly range across the six capitalization indices therefore ran from -2.7% to -4.0%, a band of 1.28 percentage points. Ultra Cap 5 outperformed Broad Cap (Diversified Weight) by 1.28 percentage points, and it outperformed Large Cap (Diversified Weight) by 1.09 percentage points. A 1.28 percentage point gap is large enough to show where the pressure sat. The best relative outcomes clustered in the 2.7% to 2.9% losses of the concentrated large-cap exposures, while the weakest outcomes sat in the 3.8% to 4.0% losses of the broader diversified baskets. Even with all 6 capitalization lines negative, it’s still clear breadth has continued to be a relative drag on performance.

Factor Analysis

Factor returns shifted again over the latest week, with Liquidity improving by 0.98 percentage points and Size falling by 1.53 percentage points. Downside Beta eased from 0.66%, in the week ending March 1st, to 0.12% in the week ending March 8th, a fall of 0.54 percentage points. Growth improved from 0.43% to 0.79%, while Liquidity moved from -0.88% to 0.09% and Momentum improved from -1.26% to -0.23%. Size went the other way, swinging from 0.81% to -0.72%, a decline of 1.53 percentage points. Value stayed positive at 0.51%, but that was down from 2.34% a week earlier, a slowdown of 1.84 percentage points. The current week’s factor set therefore ran from -0.72% in Size to 0.79% in Growth. Liquidity turning from -0.88% to 0.09% and Momentum improving from -1.26% to -0.23% suggests ‘cleaner’ trading conditions, in terms of sentiment, while Size flipping from 0.81% to -0.72% shows that investors were still unwilling to extend risk further down the capitalization curve.

Classification Series Analysis

The classification baskets all finished lower, with weekly returns clustered from -6.1% to -8.1%. The CF DeFi Composite Index fell 6.1% w/w while the CF Web 3.0 Smart Contract Platforms Index lost 7.3% w/w, and the CF Digital Culture Composite Index fell 8.1%. On that basis, DeFi outperformed Digital Culture by 1.94 percentage points and outperformed Web 3.0 platforms by 1.20 percentage points. Even so, the whole thematic block remained negative, leaving the YTD picture deeper in the red, with -26.2% for DeFi, -31.0% for Web 3.0 and -29.8% for Digital Culture. While DeFi had the best weekly print at -6.1%, there was no positive theme in absolute terms because all 3 baskets finished below 0%. All told, it looks like investors trimmed risk across all three sleeves, and the pressure was heaviest in the higher-beta culture basket, where the weekly loss reached 8.1%.

Sector Analysis

Performance across the CF Digital Asset Classification Structure (CF DACS) taxonomy showed a clear split, with the best major group at -3.45% and the weakest at -8.70%. The Non-Programmable Sub-Category led the main tiers with an average return of -3.45% w/w, supported by Bitcoin at -2.07% and Bitcoin Cash at -0.35%. Infrastructure followed at -6.43%, while Finance printed -6.69%, spanning from BAL at +15.38% to KNC at -16.79%. Culture was the weakest major Sub-Category averaging -8.70%. Inside that sleeve, CHZ rose 3.10%, but the positive print was overwhelmed by WIF at -14.17%, AXS at -14.07% and APE at -13.89%. The spread between the best and worst major Sub-Category averages therefore came to 5.25 percentage points, from -3.45% in Non-Programmable to -8.70% in Culture. That 5.25 percentage point spread directionally echoes the single-asset tape, where Bitcoin fell 2.1% and Cardano fell 12.0%. Through the DACS lens, tokens closest to store-of-value and payment use cases printed an average loss of -3.45%, while culture and meme-linked names lost 8.70% on average; and as much as 14.17% (WIF). The positive outlier in Culture, CHZ, at +3.10%, for CHZ, and in Finance, BAL, with +15.38%, did not change the sector-level order because the median move stayed negative in every group.

CF Staking Series

The staking complex was mixed on price, with weekly returns running from -5.7% in ETH Staking, to 1.5% for SOL Staking. Among the week’s de minimis prints, APT Staking returned -0.2% w/w, with its reward rate moving from Monday, March 2nd, to Sunday, March 8th, from 4.9997% to 4.9915%, a downtick of -0.82 bps. AVAX Staking returned -0.1% w/w, equating to its reward rate moving down -0.37 bps. ETH Staking returned -5.7% w/w as its reward rate fell -15.24 bps. NEAR Staking’s return was more stable in comparison, -1.0% w/w, down -4.56 bps. And SOL Staking posted a just-positive return of +1.5% w/w, a gain of 8.50 bps. Across the five series then, intra-week reward-rate changes ran from -15.24 bps to +8.50 bps. ETH was the clear outlier with a 5.7% weekly decline, while the other 4 names stayed inside a reward-rate band of -4.56 bps to +8.50 bps.

Interest Rate Analysis

Funding curves moved higher over the week, with the sharpest change concentrated in the front of the Bitcoin curve at 109.5 bps for 1-week BTC. The Session Interest Rate for Bitcoin (SIRB) rose from 4.50% to 4.79%, a move of 29.2 bps. Its 1W tenor jumped from 0.30% to 1.40%, up 109.5 bps, while BTC 3M moved from 0.89% to 0.73%, down 16.2 bps. Those 2 tenors left what amounts to a front-end ‘shock’ for the week and a softer back end in the same curve. Meanwhile, USDT shifted higher in a steadier way, with its SIRB rising from 2.19% to 2.65%. Its 1W-to-3M sector moved from 2.20% and 2.21% to 2.66% and 2.67%, which works out to gains of 45.9 bps and 46.3 bps. So, across both curves, tenor-by-tenor changes ran from -16.2 bps to +109.5 bps. The result was a sharper near-term funding premium in BTC, and a broader upward reset in USDT, with BTC spanning -16.2 bps to +109.5 bps and USDT spanning +43.5 bps to +46.7 bps. In practical terms, near-dated funding tightened faster than medium-dated funding, especially on the Bitcoin side, where 1W rose 109.5 bps and 3M fell 16.2 bps.


The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.


Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.


Weekly Index Highlights, March 30, 2026

Digital assets fell for a third week, though selling eased. Mega-cap indices like the Ultra Cap 5 (-6.7%) outperformed altcoin-heavy counterparts, with the Diversified Large Cap Index at -7.4%, highlighting continued investor preference for large caps amid broad weakness.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

8 mins read
Changes to the Token Market Price Benchmarks Series - Market Prices

The Administrator hereby announces the following changes to the Token Market Price Family.

Jon Zeffert
Jon Zeffert

Jon Zeffert

1 mins read
CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 103

* Kraken's xStocks Will Power Nasdaq's Tokenized Equities * Hashi: the New Bitcoin Collateral Layer, Priced by CF Benchmarks * CF Benchmarks Research: Understanding Bitcoin's Split from M2 Patience March tallies show how conditional ETF demand has become under the current market regime. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $458.2 million on March 2nd, $225.2 million on March 3rd, and $461.9 million on March 4th, a three-session burst of $1.15 billion. Decrypt's 'Bitcoin is Abnormal' commentary c

Ken Odeluga
Ken Odeluga

Ken Odeluga

9 mins read

Footer

Subscribe to our newsletter

The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly.

By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already subscribed? Manage your preferences

© 2026 CF Benchmarks Ltd. All rights reserved.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.

By clicking Accept, you consent to CF Benchmarks's use of cookies.

Visit Cookie Settings to learn how CF Benchmarks uses cookies and to adjust your preferences.