CF Benchmarks
CF benchmarks logo

Aug 25, 2025

CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 89


Redux


This is the CF Benchmarks Newsletter - Summer Catch-Up Edition; a stop-gap issue covering the vacation season.

Inside, you'll find a selection of recent institutionally relevant crypto developments. As usual, there's a benign bias towards what's most salient for clients of the world's largest crypto index provider by assets referenced (that's CF Benchmarks) and our products; including regulated benchmark indices, Digital Asset Frameworks, and Data Series.

We've also curated a set of recent CF Benchmarks Newsletter articles covering some of the most significant events in our space of the last few months.

It's been a busy summer, and this edition isn't a complete record.

Normal service will resume in September.


SEC on pause mode

The SEC has extended deadlines for decisions on multiple spot crypto ETF filings, chiefly for those funds proposing to invest directly in assets for which no existing physically-based ETP exists as yet, e.g., Solana, XRP, and several other assets.

Likewise, the SEC has signaled that it's consideration of the multi-asset crypto ETFs is also not yet complete.

A large swathe of notices indicating that the SEC was beginning a longer review period now point to October 2025, as the Commission potentially awaits the establishment of broader digital-asset rule making before individual approvals land.

For example, here is a tweet by Bloomberg's James Seyffart after the SEC notified 21 Shares and Bitwise of extensions to the reviews of their Solana ETF filings:

Hinting at somewhat more constructive circumstances, Seyffart also noted extended timelines before potential approval of a raft of XRP ETF filings:


ETH peaks, flows ebb

Among large-cap assets, it's undoubtedly been Ethereum's summer, culminating in fresh record high ETH prices in recent days.

Additional color on ETH from a related article can be found further down in this edition, though before then, here is a summary of the resurgent ETH ETF flow patterns seen over the last several weeks.

One-Week Surge

  • Between Aug 11–18, Ethereum spot ETFs saw a spectacular inflow of about $2.85 billion in a single week. Bitcoin ETFs, by contrast, pulled in around $548 million—a sharp divergence. The divergence is captured by Coindesk here.
  • This inflow phase also included daily inflows like $524 million on Aug 12, forming part of a multi-day streak totaling over $2.34 billion.

Broader August Momentum

  • As of mid-August, spot Ethereum ETFs had accumulated roughly $2.3 billion—nearly equal to the 500,000 ETH issued by the network since the September 2022 Merge—underscoring strong institutional demand.

Sudden Pullbacks

  • However, on August 18, Ethereum ETF flows faced turbulence: a steep $197 million single-day outflow—the second-largest on record for ETH ETFs, and the beginning of a three-day streak of withdrawals.
  • Volatility within momentum: Institutional interest remains robust, but mid-month profit-taking or sentiment shifts triggered notable short-term drawdowns.

Corporate Treasury Trend surmised

Following the lead of early movers like MicroStrategy (now simply known as Strategy) and even Tesla, the summer has also brought a wave of fresh firms adding crypto assets to their corporate treasury holdings - and disclosing such additions too.

That broad class of adoptees is distinct, though of course related, to the large swathe of newcomers seen in recent months to a relatively new class of firms now known as crypto corporate treasury companies. These seem to be closely aligned with the structure and purpose of hedge funds and/or similar investment firms, but are clearly quite a bit more than that too.

A detailed look at the two strands is beyond our scope here, though we outline key features of the trend's recent contours below.

Strategic Reserve & Inflation Hedging

  • Bitcoin remains the dominant choice. As of mid‑2025, over 50 public companies hold Bitcoin in their treasuries—collectively around 849,000 BTC, valued at nearly $93 billion. Major players like MicroStrategy hold over 582,000 BTC—about 3% of total supply. (AP News).
  • Ethereum’s appeal is rising. Firms like BitMine Immersion have pivoted from Bitcoin to Ethereum, now holding 833,000 ETH (over $3 billion), motivated by staking and DeFi yield opportunities. (AMINA Bank)

2. Diversification Beyond Bitcoin

  • Broadening beyond BTC and ETH, treasuries now often include stablecoins, tokenized Treasurys, and real-world assets (RWAs):
    • Q1–Q2 2025: Stablecoin market cap stands around $227–$246 billion, with USDC and USDT dominant; EUR-backed stablecoins are growing under MiCA regulation.
    • Tokenized U.S. Treasury bills—$2.8 billion issued via Securitize; RWAs and tokenized assets increasingly feature in corporate holdings.

3. On-Chain Liquidity & Yield Generation

  • Corporations are deploying idle crypto via DeFi protocols:
    • Use of platforms like Yearn Finance, Aave Treasury, Ondo Finance (for tokenized Treasurys) enables automated yield, liquidity optimization, and real-time settlement.
    • Institutional-grade implementations like JPMorgan’s Kinexys, which executed cross‑chain delivery-versus-payment using tokenized Treasurys and Chainlink’s CCIP.

4. Institutional Adoption Signals

  • 25% of CFOs plan to integrate digital currencies within two years, according to Deloitte’s Q2 2025 survey Deloitte Italia.
  • Around 43% of mid-to-large enterprises globally now include crypto in their financial strategy, per Deloitte’s Digital Finance Report.

5. Governance, Custody & Compliance Frameworks

  • The development of robust infrastructure has become essential:
    • MPC custody (e.g., Fireblocks), insured cold storage (BitGo), AML/KYT tools (Chainalysis, Elliptic), and smart-contract governance wallets (MetaMask Institutional).
    • Integration with ERP systems (SAP, Oracle), proof‑of‑reserve attestations, real‑time on‑chain audit trails, and multi-signature or DAO‑style governance frameworks are elevating treasury control.
  • Accounting evolution: FASB now requires fair‑value marking of digital assets with unrealized gains reflected in net income—streamlining crypto into GAAP reporting.

6. Speculation vs. Sustainability (Risks)

  • The trend carries speculative risk:
    • A summer wave raised $86 billion this year alone for crypto treasury strategies—from diverse sectors like hospitality and toys. (The Wall Street Journal)
    • Critics warn of SPAC‑like speculative momentum and caution firms about survivability in a downturn. (The Wall Street Journal)
    • Mike Novogratz argues the craze has peaked, though he sees long-term strategic treasuries remaining vital. (Business Insider)
    • MarketWatch notes that full tokenization of traditional assets remains constrained by structural and regulatory barriers.

Summer Recaps


MicroBit joins Hong Kong crypto ETF wave with dual BTC and ETH launch

MicroBit Capital Management became the latest Hong Kong firm to utilize the Asia Pacific variants of our flagship Bitcoin and Ether indices to calculate the net asset value of their ETFs.

Read the full launch post here.


Ethereal: Ethereum’s Renaissance

CFB Newsletter Issue 87 – July 28, 2025

Ethereum staged a powerful comeback over the summer, marked by surging ETF inflows, strong price performance, and renewed confidence in its long-term role in institutional portfolios.

  • ETF demand surged: Ether spot ETFs pulled in $2.12bn in the week ending July 19, including a single-day record of $727m. By late July, cumulative 2025 inflows were close to the $10bn forecast by the CFB Research team.
  • Network upgrades delivered: The Dencun (March) and Pectra (May) upgrades significantly boosted scalability, efficiency, and staking mechanics, cementing Ethereum’s investability case.
  • Market structure is evolving: Alongside record open interest in CME Ether futures, signs of a developing ETH futures “basis” suggest institutions are beginning to deploy cash-and-carry strategies in Ether, mirroring Bitcoin’s maturation.
  • Corporate adoption accelerates: Ethereum is at the center of the “corporate balance sheet unlock”—stablecoin rails like Visa’s USDC settlement on Solana and Ethereum mean treasuries are increasingly holding ETH (and SOL) to fund fees, collateralize DeFi, and capture native staking yields.

“The increase in fund flows into the Ether ETFs just as we see record net short positions into corresponding CME futures contracts indicates that institutions are beginning to deploy the same market-neutral arbitrage strategies used in Bitcoin across other large cap digital assets.” — Gabe Selby, CFA, Head of Research, CF Benchmarks (quoted in Bloomberg).

Read the full issue below

CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 87 - CFB
CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 87 - CFB

REX-Osprey lays foundation for US SOL and staking wave


REX-Osprey’s SOL Staking ETF Takes Flight

CFB Newsletter Issue 86 – July 3, 2025

The U.S. market’s first Solana ETF and its first staking-enabled ETF made its debut this summer: the REX-Osprey Solana + Staking ETF (SSK).

  • Double milestone: First U.S. ETF for Solana and first to incorporate staking rewards.
  • CF Benchmarks’ role: NAVs reference the CME CF Solana-Dollar Reference Rate (SOLUSD_RR), underscoring regulated benchmark integrity at the heart of this new product.
  • Strong launch: $12m was traded on day one—healthy for a first-to-market ETF, especially compared with earlier Solana products.
  • Structural nuance: As a ’40 Act fund, SSK faces inherent limitations on distribution and appeal relative to ’33 Act ETFs—factors institutions will weigh carefully.
  • Market signal: CME Solana Futures jumped ~44% off June lows, suggesting positive sentiment around staking-enabled ETFs and Solana’s evolving institutional profile.

Read the full article below

CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 86 - CFB
CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 86 - CFB

Kindled: In-Kind sparks new crypto ETF phase

CFB Newsletter Issue 88 – August 11, 2025

The SEC’s approval of in-kind creation and redemption for U.S. spot crypto ETFs is as pivotal as it seems—and potentially more transformative than markets yet appreciate.

  • Historic growth already: U.S. Bitcoin ETFs became the fastest-growing ETFs in history, led by BlackRock’s IBIT, which hit $70bn AUM in under 18 months—more than 5× faster than gold’s GLD.
  • IBIT’s dominance: IBIT alone controls ~60% of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF assets, underscoring how growth has been concentrated rather than evenly distributed.
  • In-kind strengthens leaders: IBIT’s advantages—brand trust, distribution scale, model-portfolio inclusion—are now reinforced by in-kind mechanisms, further sharpening its edge.
  • Leveling opportunities: While IBIT remains dominant, in-kind approval broadens the field: mandates previously deterred by cash-only redemptions now have greater choice among more specialist or crypto-native issuers.
  • Beyond BTC and ETH: In-kind could prove especially critical for ETFs tracking less-established assets, where cash-only constraints might have been a deal-breaker for allocators.

Read the full article below

CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 88 - CFB
CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 88 - CFB

SEC's portfolio pause examined


SEC Approves Grayscale’s Multi-Asset Crypto ETF… Then Presses Pause

CFB Newsletter Issue 86 – July 2, 2025

The SEC’s green light for Grayscale’s conversion of its Digital Large Cap Fund (GDLC) into a multi-asset spot crypto ETF was a landmark: the first U.S. approval for a diversified crypto portfolio holding BTC, ETH, SOL, ADA, and XRP. But the approval was quickly followed by an unusual delay.

  • Historic step: Grayscale’s approval in principle opened the door to diversified crypto ETFs—one of the most closely watched frontiers for institutional adoption. Other issuers, including Bitwise and KraneShares, also have live applications.
  • Surprise reversal: Within 24 hours, the SEC exercised a rarely used “Discretionary Review”, placing a temporary stay on the fund’s launch despite its prior approval.
  • Possible reasons: Analysts cited the inclusion of assets like XRP and Cardano—neither yet approved individually—as well as potential internal divisions within the SEC as factors.
  • Mixed regulatory signals: The pause came soon after contradictory SEC communications on staking—first a Division of CorpFin statement suggesting staking wasn’t a securities issue, then a public rebuke from Commissioner Crenshaw.
  • Institutional implications: The episode underscores that while regulatory clarity is advancing, internal divergence at the SEC could extend timelines for multi-asset approvals, even as demand for diversified crypto exposure builds.

Read the full article below

CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 86 - CFB
CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 86 - CFB

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.


Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.


Factor Friday - April 10, 2026

The market posted its strongest week of 2026 at +7.1%. However, factor breadth was notably thin. Size was the only non-market factor to finish positive at +1.3%, while growth and value lagged, suggesting the rally was driven by directional flows rather than fundamentals.

Mark Pilipczuk
Mark Pilipczuk

Mark Pilipczuk

9 mins read
CFB Talks Digital Assets Episode 56: Live X Space - Bitcoin In Crisis

Head of Research Gabe Selby, CFA is joined by Kraken's Chief Economist Thomas Perfumo, CFA, CF Benchmarks Research Analyst, Mark Pilipczuk, and Senior Product Manager, Cristian Isac.

Ken Odeluga
Ken Odeluga

Ken Odeluga

1 mins read
Announcement of Consultation on Changes to the CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index - Settlement Methodology

The Administrator is launching a consultation on proposed changes to the CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index - Settlement (BVXS) Methodology.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

1 mins read

Footer

Subscribe to our newsletter

The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly.

By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already subscribed? Manage your preferences

© 2026 CF Benchmarks Ltd. All rights reserved.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.

By clicking Accept, you consent to CF Benchmarks's use of cookies.

Visit Cookie Settings to learn how CF Benchmarks uses cookies and to adjust your preferences.