CF Benchmarks
CF benchmarks logo

Aug 10, 2025

CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 88


  • SEC's In-Kind approval is as pivotal as it seems, and then some
  • ETH/BTC ratio back in focus as Ether eyes record highs
  • CME Group's Aye Soe, CFA, on ETH/BTC Ratio futures

Kindled

The SEC's approval of in-kind creation and redemption for a broad swathe of crypto ETFs is as pivotal as it seems ... and more far-reaching than it's possible to estimate.

Given how fast U.S. Bitcoin ETFs collectively became the most successful set of ETF debuts in the history of those products, before last week’s SEC approval of in-kind creation and redemption, some observers have suggested the now-lapsed prohibition had little-to-no bearing on demand.

The breakneck pace of asset-gathering by iShares Bitcoin ETF Trust (IBIT) helps make the case in point.

IBIT hit its $50 billion milestone in December 2024, 227 trading days after launch; the fastest ETF to reach that milestone in the 32-year history of ETFs.

The fund subsequently exceeded $70 billion in assets under management (AuM) in 341 trading days, more than 5× faster than SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), and compared to the 1,691 days (more than 4½ years) SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) took to get there.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) utilizes our CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant (BRRNY) as its benchmark. With net assets of about $85 billion at the time of writing, IBIT is the largest spot Bitcoin ETF by that measure. Together with further significant assets managed within ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) with around $5.2 billion, Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) holding around $4.6bn, plus Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund (BRRR) both with over $600m each; assets referencing BRRNY equate to approximately 65% of total U.S. Bitcoin ETF AuM.

IBIT and the rest

Simultaneously though, IBIT is also where the claim that crypto ETFs don’t truly need in-kind to thrive, falls flat - because IBIT is a clear outlier.

IBIT’s share of total U.S. spot Bitcoin AuM is currently close to 60%. It was the sole spot BTC ETF with AuM above $50bn by mid-2025.

Both Fidelity’s FBTC and Grayscale’s ‘mini’ ETF (ticker: BTC) (a partial conversion, seed funded with 10% of GBTC holdings) trail in the $18bn-$20bn range. The remainder of U.S. BTC ETFs form a long thin tail; each with AuM equating to fractions of the leaders’ net assets.

In fact, most IBIT peers by product class are nowhere close to being peers by size, liquidity or broader investor recognition.

In-Kind sharpens IBIT's edge further

In other words, while the spot Bitcoin ETF category as a whole has delivered unprecedented growth—faster than gold or equity ETF launches—its success is highly concentrated, chiefly in IBIT.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF has enjoyed obvious advantages related to key strengths of the iShares franchise that outweighed concerns about cash creation and redemption.

These strengths include the market’s longstanding and deep trust of the brand, the scale of its distribution network, and more; increasing the probability that it is IBIT that is selected for model-portfolio inclusion as Bitcoin allocations increase.

Now, IBIT’s headline advantages will soon be bolstered by the newly granted permission to create/redeem in-kind.

This means that despite the same approval implicitly having been granted to all existing Bitcoin and Ether spot ETFs (as we outline lower down) IBIT’s edge will persist.

In-Kind ticks a critical box

So, in itself, the newly approved permission to create/redeem crypto ETF shares in-kind will not necessarily help fix the uneven distribution of BTC ETF assets among issuers.

But it can help level the playing field, somewhat.

Mandates that unconditionally filter funds redeeming in cash now have a wider range of vehicles available to choose from – including the more crypto-aligned, or crypto native issuers, whose specialist expertise and track record may appeal to certain investors.

As well, in-kind permission helps the case for ETFs investing in assets without the broadly recognized and widely disseminated narratives of Bitcoin, Ether and other large caps, where the impediment of having to convert into cash might conceivably have been an important decider for some investors weighing whether to allocate or not.


SEC's In-Kind Crypto Approvals - key details

Leading ETH ETFs benchmarked to ETHUSD_NY also received in-kind approval

What and Who were approved?

  • The SEC structured the approval with a coordinated, class-wide approach, authorizing in-kind creations and redemptions for all spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs with pending rule-change applications.
  • Filings by individual Self Regulating Organizations were bundled under a single Order Granting Accelerated Approval (34‑103571), and each applicant’s file (e.g., SR‑CboeBZX‑2025‑010, SR‑NYSEArca‑2025‑38, etc.) was amended and approved under the same framework
  • Every issuer for whom an in-kind proposed rule change was filed, received approval—including BlackRock, Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, ARK 21Shares, WisdomTree, Fidelity, and Invesco
  • However, there is no indication the SEC issued in-kind authority to issuers that had not filed proposed rule-change applications
  • As a result, approval is only explicitly effective for the specific issuers approved. Issuers who did not file must still do so, in order to transition to in-kind
  • Still, it's likely new applications will be rubber-stamped as a formality, given precedent

Benefits

Below, we outline the typical efficiencies and optimizations stemming from in-kind creation and redemption, plus longer-term positive implications for crypto ETFs.

For institutions: investors and authorized participants (APs)

  • Operational efficiency: Removing the need to liquidate into fiat means reduced transaction costs; less scope for slippage
  • Tax optimization: Capital gains can be deferred at redemption; marginal impact of pass-through taxation avoided
  • Tighter spreads/tracking: Both are already tight across most funds, but in-kind implies improved robustness to market conditions; increased arbitrage precision; more efficient order management
  • Institutional alignment: Alignment with physical commodity funds provides familiarity and optimized operational rails

For the broader crypto market

  • Deeper liquidity: Authorized Participants can add/remove BTC or ETH directly from ETF custody, enhancing on-chain liquidity buffers
  • Precedent for altcoin ETFs: When additional altcoins ETFs are approved (e.g., those investing in XRP, Solana, and Cardano) they are now expected to launch with in-kind mechanisms from day one
  • Regulatory signal: By approving In-Kind, SEC chair Paul Atkins, Commissioner Uyeda, and SEC staff have confirmed a more market-aligned, merit-based stance on crypto regulation, with implications for reviews of other critical matters on which decisions are near-imminent

Ethereum revival spotlights ETH/BTC ratio

The factors fueling Ether's price revival that we outlined in the prior edition continue to propel the second-largest digital asset on the upward trajectory it's been on for several weeks. Institutional practitioners even suggest Ether may now have sufficient impetus to take ETH/USD to new record peaks.

This momentum is reflected by ETH's most institutional proxy, front-month CME Ether futures, which settle to our regulated CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate, closing on Friday August 8th at $4,087.5; their strongest level since December 2024.

ETH/BTC back in focus

Meanwhile, Ethereum's recently bolstered investment case has returned the spotlight to crypto's most closely watched ratio, Ether vs. Bitcoin, the simplest parametric gauge of sentiment on Ethereum's value relative to Bitcoin's.

The ratio can provide a finer nuance of prevailing sentiment, and, potentially, can serve as a near-term indicator of relative valuation, when both assets are trending in the same direction.

Additionally, because crypto participants have traditionally expressed the price of altcoins in terms of Bitcoin, Ethereum, as the leading altcoin, remains quite a reliable indicator of sentiment on the broader altcoin market and layer 2 protocols, as well as more specifically, on DeFi.


ETH/BTC ratio - Relative Value and Opportunity

Below, we summarize a perspective on the ETH/BTC ratio, by Aye Soe, CFA, Senior Director of Financial Research and Product Development at CME Group

With the ETH/BTC ratio, like Ether itself, staying buoyed near multi-month highs for several weeks, there's a timely opportunity to explore its institutional ramifications.

To that end, CF Benchmarks is delighted to spotlight a recent article by Aye Soe, CFA, Senior Director of Financial Research and Product Development at our largest and longest-standing partner, CME Group.

Titled "Relative Value and Momentum Investment Opportunities in Ether/Bitcoin Pair", the article summarizes and assesses key ETH/BTC phases in the context of CME Group's Ether/Bitcoin Ratio futures contract, a product that provides institutional participants with a streamlined and efficient means of expressing views on the ETH/BTC relationship.

These futures are cash-settled, based on a daily ratio derived from our CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate (ETHUSD_RR) divided by our CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate (BRR). Both rates are regulated benchmarks, under the UK Benchmarks Regulation framework, assuring institutions of the highest possible standards of market integrity, replicability and representatives, as the basis of participation at scale.

Soe notes that over time, the ETH/BTC ratio has shown significant variability, capturing the different cycles of market leadership between the two assets.

As an illustration of this variability over time, the graphic below, based on data compiled by Soe, and published in her article, highlights some key snapshots of the ratio since inception.

Source: CME Group

Notably, after reaching new lows earlier in 2025 (as low as 0.018), the ratio has recently rebounded and risen above its 60-day moving average.

Such a recovery is typically interpreted as a sign that Ether could be primed for further appreciation, especially after an extended period of underperformance relative to Bitcoin.

Trading the Ether/Bitcoin Ratio

Soe goes on to suggest that CME's Ether/Bitcoin futures offer a streamlined, cost-effective and precise way for institutions to take directional or non-directional positions in support of investment or trading objectives, based on their current assessment of the relative strength of Ether and Bitcoin.

“Rather than executing two separate trades to realize the spread, the ratio is a package solution that captures both relative value and momentum opportunities embedded in the currency pair”.

Aye Soe, CFA, in "Relative Value and Momentum Investment Opportunities in Ether/Bitcoin Pair"

Timely opportunities

With the Ether/Bitcoin narrative currently central once again, as markets reassess the risk/reward balance between the two dominant cryptocurrencies, current conditions offer a timely opportunity for institutions seeking exposure or hedging strategies in this pair, to explore the ratio in the context of CME Group's ETH/BTC Ratio futures, and their underlying settlement rates, administered by CF Benchmarks.

Click the button below for the full analysis.


Head to the CME Ether/Bitcoin Ratio futures product page to explore its key features, contract specs, FAQs, and more.


Explore CF Benchmarks' CME CF Ether-Bitcoin Reference Rate (ETHBTC_USDRR)


The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.


Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.


Factor Friday - April 10, 2026

The market posted its strongest week of 2026 at +7.1%. However, factor breadth was notably thin. Size was the only non-market factor to finish positive at +1.3%, while growth and value lagged, suggesting the rally was driven by directional flows rather than fundamentals.

Mark Pilipczuk
Mark Pilipczuk

Mark Pilipczuk

9 mins read
CFB Talks Digital Assets Episode 56: Live X Space - Bitcoin In Crisis

Head of Research Gabe Selby, CFA is joined by Kraken's Chief Economist Thomas Perfumo, CFA, CF Benchmarks Research Analyst, Mark Pilipczuk, and Senior Product Manager, Cristian Isac.

Ken Odeluga
Ken Odeluga

Ken Odeluga

1 mins read
Announcement of Consultation on Changes to the CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index - Settlement Methodology

The Administrator is launching a consultation on proposed changes to the CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index - Settlement (BVXS) Methodology.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

1 mins read

Footer

Subscribe to our newsletter

The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly.

By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already subscribed? Manage your preferences

© 2026 CF Benchmarks Ltd. All rights reserved.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.

By clicking Accept, you consent to CF Benchmarks's use of cookies.

Visit Cookie Settings to learn how CF Benchmarks uses cookies and to adjust your preferences.