Or, in other words, 'could cash create/redeem' be the first domino to fall?
As we noted here, in light of the most pro-crypto administration yet (not an exaggeration, in this case) progress is now "possible on the acceptability of in-kind creation and redemption of ETF [crypto] shares."
Close observers will know that creation and redemption units of all U.S. Bitcoin and Ether ETFs are currently structured in cash.
That link above contains a crash course/refresher from ETF.com, if needed.
In essence, the 'create/redeem' jargon means the mechanism by which an ETF (investing in any asset) converts the asset into shares of the fund.
The two key ways this is done are 'in cash' or 'in-kind'; the latter meaning pretty much units of the asset itself.
There are instances where 'in-cash' makes some sense; somewhat beyond the scope of this note. Crypto isn't one of them.
And the methodology is widely recognised as less operationally, financially, and tax efficient in general, which is why most ETFs use in-kind.
It should be clear that in-cash is usually the road to additional and unnecessary inefficiencies for everyone involved: the issuer, authorized participants, market makers, and investors.
So it's difficult to believe crypto ETF issuers particularly wanted to go the in-cash route when filing to list such funds, most of which came to market a little more than a year ago.
Still; the alternative may have been to not come to market at all.
Little wonder that within days of the New Year (and with the previous administration safely in the rear-view mirror), Nasdaq, the exchange on which BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) is listed, filed a proposed rule change that, if approved by the SEC, will permit a switch to in-kind creation and redemption.
If IBIT gets to switch, of course, all existing crypto ETFs will likely switch.
Again, as we've previously speculated, such a change might be one of the easiest, and quickest crypto decisions the SEC might need to make in the near term.
Typically, the SEC has 45 days from the date on which the filing is published in The Federal Register to approve, deny or extend its review period.
The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.
Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.
Digital assets climbed, led by large caps. Programmable Settlement names outperformed, with Solana up double digits and Ethereum extending gains. Broad strength lifted the CF Large Cap Index 5.24%, signaling stronger breadth and momentum across majors.
CF Benchmarks
With institutional adoption again on the brink of a major inflection point, we're delighted to welcome Bitwise's Head of Research, Ryan Rasmussen to the CFB Talks Digital Assets podcast, for exclusive insights.
Ken Odeluga
The Administrator announces the suspension of Kiln as a CF Constituent Staking Provider for the CF Staking Series – CF ETH Staking Reward Rate Index (ETH_SRR) and related indices, effective September 11th, 2025,
CF Benchmarks