CF Benchmarks
CF benchmarks logo

Jan 29, 2025

Could 'In-kind' be a Shoo-in?

Or, in other words, 'could cash create/redeem' be the first domino to fall?

As we noted here, in light of the most pro-crypto administration yet (not an exaggeration, in this case) progress is now "possible on the acceptability of in-kind creation and redemption of ETF [crypto] shares."

Close observers will know that creation and redemption units of all U.S. Bitcoin and Ether ETFs are currently structured in cash.

That link above contains a crash course/refresher from ETF.com, if needed.

In essence, the 'create/redeem' jargon means the mechanism by which an ETF (investing in any asset) converts the asset into shares of the fund.

The two key ways this is done are 'in cash' or 'in-kind'; the latter meaning pretty much units of the asset itself.

There are instances where 'in-cash' makes some sense; somewhat beyond the scope of this note. Crypto isn't one of them.

And the methodology is widely recognised as less operationally, financially, and tax efficient in general, which is why most ETFs use in-kind.

It should be clear that in-cash is usually the road to additional and unnecessary inefficiencies for everyone involved: the issuer, authorized participants, market makers, and investors.

So it's difficult to believe crypto ETF issuers particularly wanted to go the in-cash route when filing to list such funds, most of which came to market a little more than a year ago.

Still; the alternative may have been to not come to market at all.

Little wonder that within days of the New Year (and with the previous administration safely in the rear-view mirror), Nasdaq, the exchange on which BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) is listed, filed a proposed rule change that, if approved by the SEC, will permit a switch to in-kind creation and redemption.

If IBIT gets to switch, of course, all existing crypto ETFs will likely switch.

Again, as we've previously speculated, such a change might be one of the easiest, and quickest crypto decisions the SEC might need to make in the near term.

Typically, the SEC has 45 days from the date on which the filing is published in The Federal Register to approve, deny or extend its review period.


The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.


Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.


Regulatory Reset

The SEC's engagement on crypto regulation is growing, but ETF progress remains slow. Filings beyond BTC and ETH, including staking proposals, face delays—signaling continued caution despite signs of a regulatory reset.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

3 mins read
Evolve launches Evolve XRP ETF (XRP, XRP.U), expands Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC), all powered by regulated CF Benchmarks indices

Evolve expands its suite of crypto products with one of the first North American XRP ETFs, while adding XRP to its unique crypto portfolio ETF.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

5 mins read
3iQ launches 3iQ XRP ETF (tickers: XRPQ, XRPQ.U), powered by CF Benchmarks’ regulated XRPUSD_NY index

The ETF is now trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the ticker XRPQ, for the Canadian dollar-denominated pricing series, and XRPQ.U, for the U.S. dollar-denominated pricing series.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

3 mins read