CF Benchmarks
CF benchmarks logo

Mar 08, 2025

CF Benchmarks Newsletter - Issue 77

  • CME announces SOL futures; its first new crypto market in 4 years
  • SEC exits almost all major crypto legal actions; Ripple eyed
  • Franklin, Bitwise, Hashdex begin U.S. crypto portfolio era

Retreat

The much anticipated rethink of crypto market and asset oversight appears to be well underway, though geopolitical uncertainty means optimism on the outlook for the asset class hasn't been enough to support prices.

The cadence of developments in the regulatory sphere seemed to quicken after the establishment of the Crypto Task Force in January, led by the Commission's longest-standing digital asset proponent, Hester Peirce.

We covered several such points in the piece linked below.

SEC edges closer to key approvals - CFB
SEC edges closer to key approvals - CFB

Since then, if anything, indications have proliferated.

Further down in this edition, we tally the SEC'S recent string of legal capitulations, as further evidence of a change in its overarching regulatory stance.


Franklin, Bitwise, Hashdex launch crypto ETF portfolio era

First, it’s worth noting the backdrop of this evolving regulatory picture is the steady roll of Bitcoin and Ether-based ETFs that continue to see a smooth path to market. We’re pleased to report these include three funds from existing clients. Just as important, they're among the first ever U.S.-listed crypto portfolios, albeit, for now, they only invest in the two largest digital assets, Bitcoin and Ether.

Franklin's EZPZ path to BTC & ETH

The Franklin Crypto ETF (EZPZ) is among the first to become available for trade, with a listing on Cboe BZX. It’s structured to initially represent the capitalization weights of Bitcoin and Ether, according to our CF Institutional Digital Asset Index - US - Settlement Price (IDAX, Bloomberg: CFIDAX).

Still, as Franklin’s Head of Digital Assets, Roger Bayston, and Head of ETF Product and Capital Markets, David Mann make clear in our latest CFB Talks Digital Assets episode, Bitcoin and Ether are just the beginning for EZPZ. Other assets will be added in synch with their addition to IDAX. As the IDAX web page indicates, additional assets will enter the portfolio as they're “recognized as being in conformance with major financial jurisdictions prevailing capital markets”.

Click below to hear all the EZPZ details, Franklin’s potential future crypto plans, plus the team's deep insights on a range of digital asset themes.

CFB Talks Digital Assets Episode 39: Bitcoin and Ether made EZPZ with Franklin’s Roger Bayston and David Mann - CFB
CFB Talks Digital Assets Episode 39: Bitcoin and Ether made EZPZ with Franklin’s Roger Bayston and David Mann - CFB
Bitwise speeds toward joint ETF

The SEC later issued an order granting accelerated approval for Bitwise’s Bitcoin and Ethereum ETP on NYSE Arca. It will be the firm’s third U.S. exchange listed crypto fund to come to market. At the time of writing, the Commission had yet to separately greenlight the fund’s registration statement (S-1) though after a form 19b-4 approval, that’s a near certainty.

Bitwise already offers Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB), the NAV of which is calculated from our CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant (BRRNY). Meanwhile, the NAV of Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) is determined from our CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate – New York Variant (ETHUSD_NY). The group has opted to calculate BTC and Ether portfolio value, and ultimately NAV, from the same indices.

Hashdex launches its first U.S. crypto ETF

The Bitwise news follows the launch of another fund offering joint Bitcoin and Ethereum exposure, and the first U.S.-listed crypto ETF by another high-profile digital assets-focused issuer. The Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) began trading on February 14th. It tracks Nasdaq‘s BTC and ETH portfolio, Nasdaq Crypto US™ Index (NCIUS); a part of the Nasdaq Crypto Index Family, for which CF Benchmarks is Calculation Agent.

BlackRock opens Swiss crypto outpost

U.S. crypto fund issuers are continuing to expand overseas too.

BlackRock hasn't commented on its recent incorporation of iShares Digital Assets AG in Zurich, reported by Reuters. But a Switzerland-domiciled entity could be the group's first move in a plan to eventually enter Europe's well-developed, though relatively small, in capitalization terms, crypto ETP market.

Meanwhile BlackRock's circa $58bn AuM iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), listed on Nasdaq, tracks our CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant (BRRNY), bringing BRRNY assets under reference to about 60% of the U.S. BTC ETF total. A new iShares BTC ETP tracking BRRNY's European-hours variant, BRR, could enjoy favourable market structural conditions.

Elsewhere, Hashdex, maintains its largely overlooked crypto pioneer status. It's on track to list the world's first spot XRP ETF, following approval last month from Brazil’s securities regulator CVM. (More details in the piece below.)

Hashdex set to launch world’s first XRP ETF - CFB
Hashdex set to launch world’s first XRP ETF - CFB

Kraken CEO Dave Ripley's tweet in response to the SEC dropping its lawsuit

Backtracking

As mentioned, the SEC has been busy on the legal front in recent weeks, though in retrograde fashion. After a several years-long barrage of investigations and enforcements against crypto firms, the Commission has been busily backtracking on dozens of the cases. In fact by our reckoning, the SEC has in one way or another exited or paused almost all major crypto enforcement actions or investigations.

Here, we attempt to tally all SEC exits from crypto investigations and enforcement actions so far this year.

They're summarized below. We include the SEC's ongoing appeal vs. Ripple Labs, as that now seems to be proceeding in name only; as we explain later.

Major SEC crypto enforcements or investigations ended, or paused, this year
Source: CF Benchmarks

Only one or two case relate directly to investment products. But a trend change in the Commission's crypto stance has obvious read-across to its underlying tenets on a range of positions regarding crypto ETFs.

Kraken, Coinbase Gemini off the hook

The latest instance came this week, with the SEC agreeing in principle to drop its lawsuit against Kraken. Echoing details of the Commission’s exit from cases against Coinbase, and Gemini, Kraken said it is not required to admit wrongdoing, pay a fine, or make any changes to its business practices. All three of the above are CME CF Constituent Exchanges, though SEC actions have obviously been way broader.

Robinhood’s statement towards the end of last month that the SEC ended its investigation into Robinhood Crypto “with no action”, should also be included.

Binance pause

Meanwhile, the SEC's two-year lawsuit against Binance took a different turn. The Commission and the largest offshore U.S. exchange filed a joint motion for a 60-day pause; apparently at the behest of the agency, which argued in a statement the work of its Crypto Task Force “may impact and facilitate the potential resolution of this case.”

This looks like the same model the SEC applied to its civil fraud case against Tron founder, Justin Sun, and the Tron Foundation. Sun and the Commission agreed to submit a status report following negotiations that will take place during a 60-day stay.

We've argued the SEC vs. Binance pause may have implications for other live SEC cases, including its complaint against Ripple Labs. This former SEC official appears to agree.

As does former SEC Enforcement Division chief, John Reed Stark, in a rather colourful LinkedIn post. His view is that for any remaining crypto enforcement actions, it's a matter of when, not if:

"My guess is that all SEC crypto-related investigations have already been secretly "paused" and that SEC crypto-enforcement resources have already been shifted to other priorities."

The SEC is currently an appellant in its dispute with Ripple, after a court fined the XRP issuer just $125 million, and ruled sales of the token only partially violated securities regulations. A pause could have far-reaching effects: the case overhangs several high-profile ETF filings, as well as ambitious plans by Ripple itself.

DeFi win

It's not just centralized exchange operators. Uniswap Labs, which initially warned it faced unregistered securities complaints around a year ago, called the SEC's signal of an end to the probe a “huge win for DeFi”.

OpenSea also said at the end of last month the agency verged on closing its investigation, after the NFT platform revealed a Wells Notice last August. MetaMask developer Consensys, announced similar late last month as well.

Elsewhere, the Commission dropped an appeal against a ruling favouring the Blockchain Association and Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas, on the ‘dealer definition’ rule change. The rule change had threatened to widen the definition to untenable levels. A federal judge had concluded in November: “the SEC exceeded its statutory authority".

Staking discussed

Adjacently, Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart noted a memo to Crypto Task Force chair Peirce, ahead of a meeting where “the ability to include staking as a feature in exchange traded products” would be discussed.

The SEC ruled out staking ahead of the launch of Ether ETFs last year, so this fact-finding initiative is another sign an anticipated shift is underway.

Ironically, despite signs of a trend change in the Commission's views, the absence of overarching statements or policy frameworks on exchange traded crypto products, for now, means a degree of uncertainty remains. Still, any residual doubts on how bona fide the regulatory reset will be, ought to be dispelled.


CME SOL futures launch could quicken ETF approvals

In a move that’s likely to be as impactful as the arrival of Bitcoin and, eventually, Ether futures, CME Group is set to launch trading in derivatives of a third cryptocurrency for the first time.

Pending regulatory approval, SOL futures will be available to trade from March 17th, around four years after CME last added a crypto asset to its marketplace, with ETH futures.

Like all CME crypto derivatives, CME SOL futures will settle to a regulated CF Benchmarks Reference Rate; the CME CF Solana-Dollar Reference Rate (SOLUSD_RR).

This launch could have an impact as positive and almost as far reaching as the leading derivative venue's entrance into the digital asset market around 8 years ago, with Bitcoin futures.

First, there are the typical market structural benefits from the addition of a CFTC-regulated tool for risk management and strategic trading, levelling up Solana facilities, just as the addition of CME BTC and ETH derivatives did, for Bitcoin and Ether.

CME SOL and SOL ETFs

The batch of active filings for spot Solana ETFs parked at the SEC could benefit too.

Under what we've termed the SEC's 'old doctrine' (basically, the Commission's 'stealth' conditions for crypto ETF approval) the existence of CFTC-regulated Designated Contract Markets, i.e. CME crypto derivatives, and a Designated Clearing Organisation - CME Clearing - helped establish BTC and ETH as commodities. This enabled a regulatory framework for issuance of crypto ETF stock as commodity trust shares.

We've also long thought the 'old doctrine' would lapse in line with a regulatory reset - like the one going on now. We expected this would take time though. At a minimum, we thought new rules would need to be established before a crypto ETF could be approved, without the existence of a CFTC-regulated "market of significant size", to quote the phrase often used by the SEC when rejecting crypto ETF filings in years past.

Well, clearly the Commission has recently been moving in the direction of new rulemaking. For Solana, though, perhaps the process has been favourably short-circuited. The existence of CME SOL futures will mean almost all market structural facilities present when Bitcoin and Ether ETF applications were approved will also be present for the six proposed Solana ETFs.

Incidentally, as the table below shows, most active SOL ETF filings parked at the SEC cite our SOLUSD_RR as benchmark.

Active Solana ETF filings
Source: CF Benchmarks

That's not to suggest use of SOLUSD_RR in an ETF is essential for regulatory reasons. It's historically been the availability of regulatory look-through from the existence of a regulated futures market that's been important to the SEC. With CME SOL futures, the SEC will have that for SOL ETFs, whether it will continue to insist on it in future for other crypto ETFs, or not.

Meanwhile, for issuers who will utilize SOLUSD_RR as their SOL benchmark, additional visibility and efficiency will be available, similar to BTC and ETH counterparties using our benchmarks for those ETFs.

With APs, MMs, and other ETF participants coordinating around the same Reference Rate, and its streaming spot variant, CME CF Solana-Dollar Real Time Index (SOLUSD_RTI), and potentially transacting CME SOL futures that also settle to SOLUSD_RR (while generally tracking SOLUSD_RTI by default) potential additional efficiencies for SOLUSD_RR-based ETFs are obvious.


Read more about CME SOL futures and SOLUSD_RR below.

CME Group announces Solana Futures powered by our CME CF Solana-Dollar Reference Rate - CFB
CME Group announces Solana Futures powered by our CME CF Solana-Dollar Reference Rate - CFB

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.


Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.


Changes to the Token Market Price Benchmarks Series - Market Prices – 15 April 2026

The Administrator has confirmed changes to the Token Market Price Family for the period between April 6th, 2026, to April 15th, 2026.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

1 mins read
Most Factors Retreat in Extended Market Correction

CF Benchmarks’ Quarterly Factor Report breaks down digital asset performance through a systematic factor lens, highlighting the key drivers of risk and return to help investors better understand market behavior across different regimes.

Mark Pilipczuk
Mark Pilipczuk

Mark Pilipczuk

4 mins read
Weekly Index Highlights, April, 13, 2026

The crypto market remained in a guarded mood in the recent week. BTC was +2.1% and ETH +1.7%, but breadth was thin as only two of seven majors finished higher. Still, capitalization indices gained between 0.5% and 1.7%, while our BVXS implied vol. index fell, and BTC front-end rates fell sharply.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

7 mins read

Footer

Subscribe to our newsletter

The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly.

By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already subscribed? Manage your preferences

© 2026 CF Benchmarks Ltd. All rights reserved.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.

By clicking Accept, you consent to CF Benchmarks's use of cookies.

Visit Cookie Settings to learn how CF Benchmarks uses cookies and to adjust your preferences.