Dear reader,
We at CF Benchmarks are pleased to present our inaugural outlook for the 2023 calendar year. This annual exercise is designed for existing or prospective crypto investors who are trying to better understand how to allocate capital in today’s challenging environment. Our team has been privileged to be on the vanguard of both facilitating and witnessing the institutional adoption of this emerging asset class. Although this past year has presented significant challenges, the team at CF Benchmarks has been able to achieve significant milestones: indexed Assets under Reference (AuR) rose steadily past $2b USD, we have launched a series of new products including, 7 portfolio indices and over 30 reference rates, along with the first ever Bitcoin Interest Rate Curve (BIRC), and finally, a comprehensive framework for categorizing digital assets (the CF Digital Asset Classification Structure). As we head into the new year, we couldn’t be more optimistic for the long-term future of digital assets. We appreciate this despite elevated levels of uncertainty and numerous industry hurdles still intact. Therefore, we have concisely laid out our base-case roadmap for crypto markets in this outlook which can be centered on three major themes for 2023:
Sincerely,
C.E.O. CF Benchmarks
Crypto investors will likely look back at 2022 as a year to forget. The shift in the macro climate that began in late 2021 has had a profound impact on the asset class. Central banks across the globe conceded to being too passive on inflation, which has led to sizable increases in policy rates and interest rates overall. What was once a steady period of easy financial conditions was over, and now risky assets (like crypto) had to face a higher discounting mechanism.
This hostile macro environment eventually sparked a new bear-market cycle. Our CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index has fallen over 75%. Adding to higher rates, a series of exogenous shocks has led crypto markets lower. The bear market that began earlier this year has only intensified after each over-levered institution or organization collapses. Each failure has had a cascading impact on the overall asset-class, with the falling prices of crypto markets sparking an industry deleveraging exercise, spreading contagion that leads to even further discounting of crypto assets. These events and circumstances have inspired the three themes of our 2023 outlook: Relief of the macro-heads, Regulatory clarity, and a subsequent Recovery led by secular crypto trends.
Risk sentiment has begun to look into the future for an eventual pivot or slowdown in monetary tightening. The most recent inflationary trends indicate that headline pricing pressures may have peaked in June. This dynamic has shown to be supportive of crypto-markets, which particularly face headwinds from a rising interest rate environment. However, as prior leading categories of inflating begin to fall (i.e., energy), core services inflation is likely to be more difficult to tame and the overall level of inflation is likely to remain above any acceptable threshold for some time.
As we look ahead into 2023, the key monetary-policy variables for investors will be a shift from focusing on the pace of rate hikes (which will slow), to monitoring the level and duration of terminal policy rates.
Level: we believe that the Fed will pause their rate hiking cycle in the early second quarter of 2023, marking the peak Fed funds target at 5%.
Duration: our outlook is that the world will face a mild (or shallow) recession in 2023 that will lead to central banks across the globe to slowly begin cutting rates sooner than policymakers have suggested, potentially in early 2H’23.
Relief will arrive for the Fed and investors as inflation and aggregate demand cool off. Risk sentiment will likely continue to price ahead of this pivot, which should likely shift last year’s headwind into a slight tailwind.
Current:
Incoming:
Current:
Incoming:
Current:
Incoming:
Current:
Incoming:
Current:
Incoming:
Current:
Incoming:
Unfortunately, the most memorable events associated with crypto markets and finance this year have been some of the most egregious ever seen in the short history of digital assets. Among the litany of high-profile cryptocurrency project collapses this year the most notable include the disintegration in May of Terraform Labs’ algorithmic ‘stablecoin’ UST, and governance token LUNA; which in turn triggered a spate of insolvencies, including hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, lenders Voyager, Celsius; before FTX’s implosion in November - which served the final straw for BlockFi, among others.
Aside from the direct impacts of these multiple event clusters, at the corporate level, on consumers, and on market equilibrium, all of which are quantifiable to a degree and likely to become more so in the medium term, the extent of corrosion of institutions’ inclination to adopt digital assets — as market participants and as service providers — will take longer to assess. Some of the most likely set of consequences are widely expected to be the acceleration of the development of regulatory controls and standards.
It should be clear that regulatory responses must reflect the variety and complexity of crypto services available and their providers, or the measures are likely to be ineffective. As the leading regulated cryptocurrency Benchmark Administrator, CF Benchmarks obviously has a keen interest in all aspects of digital asset regulation for the furtherance of our mission to promote the integrity of its markets and services for the benefit of all.
In view of expectations that the development of crypto regulation is likely to accelerate in the year ahead, we think our view of the regulatory outlook for digital assets in 2023 will be instructive. Policymakers have a historical opportunity to tackle some of the most pressing issues plaguing the industry. In the U.S. for example, the traditional investment community still lacks a ‘spot ETF’ product that can track the underlying fund assets more closely. Additionally, regulatory gaps and opaqueness surrounding the formal categorization of digital assets has left many established institutions in limbo, forcing some users to seek services in less-sophisticated regulatory regimes. This has created an environment where consumer protections have been compromised or flat-out ignored. We believe that it is worth focusing more attention to the regulatory developments in the most pivotal regions that have global influence (such as the U.S. or EU).
Ultimately, the recent setbacks has shattered confidence and hurt investors should provide a new sense of urgency for policymakers. A clearer, robust regulatory framework is needed to help protect investors, while also allowing this emerging technology to continue to develop into its full potential. We believe that clarity surrounding existing and potential legislation will provide a positive catalyst for restoring confidence and accelerating the institutional adoption of digital assets.
Now that we are familiar with how this most recent bear market cycle has played out, investors are interested in answering the question “what are some key catalysts that will be supportive of digital assets?” It is our view that the next recovery phase will likely stem from the prevailing secular themes that once helped bolster crypto markets to their $3tn water-mark in late 2021.
Additionally, we would like to emphasize that the best approach for investors to take advantage of these secular themes is through a diversified, strategic (or longer-term) allocation to digital assets which will facilitate the forthcoming highlighted trends.
The crypto market remains in its early days. If we were to compare its market capitalization (or size) to other traditional markets, such as global equities (+111tn) or fixed income ($128tn) then we can clearly see how marginal crypto’s sub $1tn amount is in comparison. One likely reason for this stark difference in size can be explained by the degree of institutional presence, where other traditional markets are dominated. Meanwhile, these large players are only getting started with gaining exposure to digital assets.
Looking at futures data on bitcoin as proxy for institutional demand, we can see that open interest, or outstanding positions, has remained on a steady uptrend. This is despite the recent bear-market cycle which started in late 2021. The divergence seen between the two is likely to boomerang in 2023. Like the mid-2020 period, open interest rose rapidly as the price of bitcoin remained relatively stagnant. Using history as a guide, we expect that the current divergence in institutional interest and lack of price action is indicative of where bitcoin prices are likely to go over the next 12-months.
We believe that digital assets are likely to take another step forward in their maturity cycle. This incoming phase can be centered on the next wave of institutional adoption. Institutional investors are likely to be attracted to the asymmetrical return potential that’s unique to crypto. Meanwhile, other traditional risk-assets are likely to remain relatively challenged by the weaker growth environment in 2023.
The challenging market conditions that led to crypto’s deleveraging exercise has had a material impact on the decentralized finance (DeFi) space. Last May, the collapse of the Terra / Luna ecosystem shrank total value locked (TVL) by approximately $130b. Recently, the FTX fallout caused another $20b decrease in TVL. This has left the size of the segment at just approximately $60b, down from over $250b a year ago. Other key metrics, such as Decentralized Exchange (DEX) trading volumes and developer activity, have trended lower in a similar fashion, making 2022 a year that has placed DeFi in existential crises.
However, not everything has been ‘doom and gloom’. Total wallet growth has remained resilient, and liquid staking, which allows staked assets to receive a tradable version of their locked-up token, has grown in popularity. Another positive development revolves around the momentum seen in scaling solutions. These developments have been very complementary to DeFi protocols as cost efficiency and bandwidth has historically challenged user experiences. Lastly, a DeFi pilot program by the Singaporean Central Bank successfully executed the first ever tokenized forex transaction on a public blockchain, marking a major milestone for the technology expanding into other, more traditional asset classes.
The Defi space is one of the more nascent segments in crypto. The challenges this past year should be viewed as a temporary set back, not a death sentence. We believe that developer activity will recover along with transaction volumes (revenue). Lastly, the relative resilience and continued improvements in the segment should garner more interest from institutions. The potential benefits of public blockchains for enhancing existing financial services and trading other real-world assets (RWAs) are apparent (such as autonomy and efficiency) and will likely lead to more milestones in 2023.
The crypto community witnessed a major achievement this year with the successful merge of ethereum's legacy blockchain to its newer, more efficient network. Executing this major change in the consensus mechanism was a risky endeavor, but the subsequent success of the upgrade has paved the way for wider adoption since a PoS network addresses the major environmental concerns that are apparent in running a large proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain network.
Layer-2 scaling solutions have taken advantage of the recent upgrade. Some of the most popular scalers have announced or launched ‘roll-up’ mechanisms on their respective side-chains. Roll-ups allow layer-2 blockchains to efficiently aggregate a series of transactions on a side chain by rolling them up into a single transaction on the parent layer-1 chain, such as ethereum. Furthermore, ethereum 2.0’s sharding mechanism, which is anticipated to be released in 2023, will also for these side-chains to split the load of processing transactions, without reducing the number of nodes or compromising security validation. Roll-ups and Sharding are viewed to compliment each other as they similarly help solve a blockchain’s so called ‘trilemma’ of decentralization, security and scalability. Some estimate that the ethereum network will be able to achieve up to 100K transactions-per-second (or TPS). Lastly, Bitcoin’s layer 2 payment protocol, known as the Lightning Network, works in a similar fashion. Lightning developers continued open bandwidth in 2022, and many estimate that its network can achieve a TPS capacity of 1,000,000, which would mean that these scaled networks are set to outpace traditional payment processors, such as Visa, which is claimed to only be able to process 24K TPS.
Roll-ups and sharding will help layer-1 networks continue to solve blockchain’s “trilemma” of decentralization, security, and scalability. PoW blockchains, such as bitcoin, will follow the successful ‘Lightning Network’ roadmap which has allowed its original layer-1 chain to scale. These developments in decentralized networks is critical for real-world use case adoption. The recent achievements, along with planned updates in 2023, should be enough to tip the scales.
Our digital culture segment, which allows investors to gain exposure to protocols that support cultural experiences like the metaverse, NFTs, gaming, and music, has also seen its 2021 euphoria evaporate over the past year.
This has left investors questioning where the next positive wave may come from. Currently, major blue-chip companies are investing heavily into both software and hardware applications to support the metaverse. Like the 1990s, this emerging platform will feasibly transform the web as we know it. Big tech firms are studying ways to allow users to plug into decentralized applications (dApps) and allow users to share virtual artwork, interact in social media, or play games. Furthermore, metaverse and web 3.0 marketplaces will be centered on connecting crypto wallets which will allow for a companies to develop new product suites, and for their customers to unlock special rewards. Lastly, venture capitalists have remained interested in this digital ecosystem, albeit slowing allocations in the 2H’22. Funding for web 3.0 companies remained near all-time-high levels despite the recent cool down in digital assets and challenging macro environment.
Broader adoption of the metaverse is likely to bring added tail winds for complementary segments, such as Digital Culture and Web 3.0. This virtual universe augments or blends technological assets like games, NFTs, virtual reality, or even social media, and it is even likely to reach the day-to-day office environment through virtual conferencing as soon as this coming year.
Appendix: CF Digital Asset Classification Structure
The CF Digital Asset Classification Structure (CF DACS) classifies coins and tokens based on the services that the associated software protocol delivers to end users, grouping assets by the role they play in delivering services to end users. The CF DACS powers CF Benchmarks' sector composite and category portfolio indices and allows users to perform attribution analysis to better understand the fundamental drivers of returns within their digital asset portfolios.
Additional Resources
For more information about our CF Benchmark indices and our methodologies, please visit the respective web links below:
Contact Us
Have a question or would like to chat? If so, please drop us a line to:
The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.
Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.
Ken Odeluga
Gabriel Selby