CF Benchmarks
CF benchmarks logo

Mar 30, 2026

Weekly Index Highlights, March 30, 2026

Market Performance Update

Digital assets extended their losing streak into a third consecutive week, though the pace of selling moderated relative to the prior period. Bitcoin declined 6.2% week-on-week (w/w) through Sunday, March 29th, bringing its year-to-date (YTD) loss to 24.3%, compared with a 6.5% weekly drop the week before. Ether fell 7.9% w/w, nudging its YTD drawdown to 33.2%. Solana was the weakest of the major names, losing 10.1% w/w and now sitting at -34.3% YTD. That left the single-asset basket spanning -6.2% to -10.1% on the week, a 3.9% range between best and worst that is virtually identical to the prior week’s 4.0% spread. While the narrower weekly losses across most names might tempt observers to call a stabilization, every asset in the basket still posted a deeper YTD drawdown than it held seven days earlier. BTC’s relative outperformance of 1.7% versus ETH and 3.9% versus SOL continues to reinforce the liquidity and quality premium that has characterized the sell-off since late January.

Volatility Analysis

Bitcoin volatility sent a mixed signal this week, with implied edging higher while realized pulled back. The CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index (BVXS) closed Friday, March 27th at 55.80, up 0.84 vol. points from 54.96 the previous Friday. Realized volatility, meanwhile, moved in the opposite direction, declining from 55.58 to 54.20, a fall of 1.38 vol. points. That shift re-established an implied premium of 1.60 points over realized, reversing last week’s configuration in which realized had overtaken implied by 0.62 points. The swing in the spread amounts to 2.22 vol. points in a single week. In context, this pattern suggests that the options market is pricing in elevated uncertainty looking forward even as the pace of spot-level turbulence has modestly cooled. Whereas last week’s narrative was one of realized catching up with implied, the latest snapshot shows implied pulling ahead again, which is more consistent with hedging demand and directional positioning than with purely reactive spot repricing. Both measures remain comfortably above 54, well within the upper half of the trailing twelve-month range (34.77 to 76.60 for BVXS), so conditions remain elevated relative to longer-run norms.

Market Cap Index Performance

Market-cap indices continued to move in formation, though the spread between best and worst widened modestly from the prior week. CF Ultra Cap 5 fell 6.7% w/w to bring its YTD return to -26.2%, while the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index and CF Large Cap Index (Free Float Market Cap Weight) both declined 6.7%, matching on both weekly and year-to-date performance at approximately -26.2%. The CF Broad Cap Index (Free Float Market Cap Weight) also printed -6.7% on the week for a -26.2% YTD loss. Diversified-weight variants lagged once more: the CF Large Cap (Diversified Weight) fell 7.4% w/w, and the CF Broad Cap (Diversified Weight) lost 7.2%. Across the full set, weekly returns ranged from approximately -6.7% to -7.4%, a spread of about 0.7 %, modestly wider than last week’s 0.64 % gap. The diversified-weight Large Cap lagged its free-float counterpart by 0.68 %, while the Broad Cap divergence was 0.56 %. The persistent underperformance of diversified-weight versions relative to free-float continues to underscore the mega-cap quality bid: in a market still pressing lower, investors are expressing a clear preference for the deepest liquidity pools, and any index methodology that spreads weight more evenly across constituents is absorbing incrementally more damage.

Factor Analysis

Factor returns shifted once again this week, with the prior week’s Momentum leadership fading and Downside Beta reverting deeper into negative territory. Downside Beta posted -1.39% for the week, compared with -0.61% previously, a 0.78 % deterioration that signals a return of the defensive skew that had eased only one week earlier. Momentum remained positive at 1.05%, though it narrowed from last week’s +1.31%, a 0.26 % decline. Growth printed -0.32%, broadly in line with the prior week’s -0.36%, suggesting no meaningful rotation into or out of growth-oriented names. Liquidity was negative at -0.78%, a sharp move from +0.11% previously, a 0.89 % swing that indicates the market’s liquidity premium came under pressure. Size printed -1.19%, worsening from +0.51%, a 1.70 % reversal that suggests smaller-cap constituents bore disproportionate selling pressure after briefly outperforming. Value moved to -0.64%, improving from -1.68%, a 1.04 % recovery. The overall factor range spans +1.05% (Momentum) to -1.39% (Downside Beta), a 2.44 % spread. Read together, the picture is one of renewed defensiveness: Downside Beta’s deeper negative print and the reversal of Size and Liquidity imply that the prior week’s hints of broadening were premature, with flows re-concentrating into higher-quality, more liquid names.

Classification Series Analysis

Within the CF Classification Series, all three thematic baskets declined again, though the ordering shifted from the prior week. The CF Digital Culture Composite Index fell 7.4% w/w, for a YTD return of -32.9%, while the CF DeFi Composite Index lost 7.6% w/w, bringing its YTD drawdown to -30.9%. The CF Web 3.0 Smart Contract Platforms Index was the weakest of the three at -8.8% w/w and -32.2% YTD. The spread between the best and worst weekly performers was 1.4 %, tighter than last week’s 2.0 % gap, which continues the trend of compressed downside dispersion within the theme complex. The notable rotation here is that Web 3.0 Smart Contract Platforms, which had been the relative outperformer the week before at -9.1%, became the laggard this week at -8.8%. Culture’s comparatively shallower -7.4% loss represents an improvement from -9.9% the prior week, while DeFi’s -7.6% also moderated from -11.1%. In aggregate, the classification tape remains directionally negative with diminishing differentiation between themes, implying that selling pressure is hitting protocol beta, cultural exposure and DeFi with roughly equal force rather than concentrating in any single vertical.

Sector Analysis

Sector performance across the CF Digital Asset Classification Structure (CF DACS) was once again uniformly negative, but the ordering of Sub-Categories produced a somewhat different ranking than the prior week. Non-Programmable was the best-performing Sub-Category with an average weekly return of -4.2%, led by XLM at -0.1% and BCH at -2.6%. Infrastructure averaged -4.6%, with TAO’s 10.8% gain and FET’s 6.5% rise in the Computing sub-sector providing a notable bright spot against the otherwise negative tape. Culture averaged -5.4%, an improvement from -10.3% the prior week, while Finance posted -6.5%. Programmable averaged -9.2%, and Utility was the weakest at -10.0%, a sharp reversal from last week when it had been the best-performing Sub-Category at -1.9%. The spread between the best and worst major Sub-Categories was 5.8 %, narrower than the prior week’s 8.4 % range. Within the constituent set, the gap between TAO at +10.8% and DOT at -13.0% produced a range of returns that spanned roughly 23.8%, well below the 41.8 % range seen the week before, indicating that idiosyncratic dispersion compressed alongside the broader sell-off. The AI and computing narrative’s relative strength within Infrastructure is the clearest thematic signal this week, while Utility’s slide from best to worst suggests that last week’s outperformance may have been more noise than durable rotation.

CF Staking Series

Within the CF Staking Series, conditions were markedly calmer this week compared with the prior period’s APT-driven dislocation. APT Staking was essentially flat on the week, gaining 0.02% w/w after last week’s -50.7% collapse; its reward rate edged up by 0.04 bps to 2.45%, barely changed from the post-reset level of 2.46%. AVAX Staking ticked down -0.05% w/w with a reward rate decline of 0.28 bps. ETH Staking posted a 19.1% weekly decline, which was by far the largest move in the complex this week, with its reward rate moving from 3.08% to 2.49%. SOL Staking gained 0.58% w/w, with its reward rate rising from 5.61% to 5.64%, up 3.26 bps. NEAR Staking was the strongest performer at +0.72% w/w, with a reward rate increase of 3.40 bps to 4.78%. Setting aside ETH’s notable weekly decline, the remaining staking series sat within a tight range, pointing to broadly stable yield conditions. The ETH Staking return figure warrants monitoring over the coming week for any structural shift in staking economics.

Interest Rate Analysis

Across our CF BIRC curves, Bitcoin funding conditions displayed a more pronounced front-end premium this week, while USDT rates held largely steady. The Session Interest Rate for Bitcoin (SIRB) moved from 10.53% at the end of the prior week to 12.66%, an increase of 213.4 bps that reverses most of the prior week’s 84.2 bps decline. The BTC 1W rate more than doubled from 1.53% to 3.41%, a 188.4 bps jump, while BTC 3M fell from 0.30% to 0.10%, down 19.7 bps, leaving the front-end gap between 1W and 3M at 3.31 %, a significant widening from the 1.23% gap one week earlier. BTC 2M was virtually unchanged at 0.55%. The term structure thus steepened materially at the front end, with the kink identified last week becoming more pronounced. In USDT funding, the session rate edged higher from 2.36% to 2.46%, up 10.0 bps, with the 1W rate at 2.48% and 3M at 2.56%, implying a flat but gently upward-sloping curve. Across both curves, the most striking development is the re-acceleration of short-dated BTC funding, which at 12.66% on the session rate suggests elevated demand for leveraged long positioning or short-term borrowing, even as the longer-dated BTC curve remained subdued. The contrast with USDT’s calm, marginally higher trajectory underscores the distinct dynamics at work in native crypto funding versus dollar stablecoin markets.


The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.


Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.


Weekly Index Highlights, March 30, 2026

Digital assets fell for a third week, though selling eased. Mega-cap indices like the Ultra Cap 5 (-6.7%) outperformed altcoin-heavy counterparts, with the Diversified Large Cap Index at -7.4%, highlighting continued investor preference for large caps amid broad weakness.

CF Benchmarks
CF Benchmarks

CF Benchmarks

8 mins read
Changes to the Token Market Price Benchmarks Series - Market Prices

The Administrator hereby announces the following changes to the Token Market Price Family.

Jon Zeffert
Jon Zeffert

Jon Zeffert

1 mins read
CF Benchmarks Newsletter Issue 103

* Kraken's xStocks Will Power Nasdaq's Tokenized Equities * Hashi: the New Bitcoin Collateral Layer, Priced by CF Benchmarks * CF Benchmarks Research: Understanding Bitcoin's Split from M2 Patience March tallies show how conditional ETF demand has become under the current market regime. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $458.2 million on March 2nd, $225.2 million on March 3rd, and $461.9 million on March 4th, a three-session burst of $1.15 billion. Decrypt's 'Bitcoin is Abnormal' commentary c

Ken Odeluga
Ken Odeluga

Ken Odeluga

9 mins read

Footer

Subscribe to our newsletter

The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly.

By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already subscribed? Manage your preferences

© 2026 CF Benchmarks Ltd. All rights reserved.

CF Benchmarks Ltd (“CF Benchmarks”), a company registered in England and Wales with company number 11654816 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Information about us can be found on the Financial Services Register (register number 847100).

Registered Office: 6th Floor One London Wall, London, United Kingdom, EC2Y 5EB.

You agree not to, and have no rights to, use the CF Benchmarks Data to create, calculate, issue, settle, maintain, support or develop any financial instruments (including but, without limitation exchange traded products, certificates, warrants, contracts for difference, swaps, binary options, structured products), indices, products, services (including but without limitation, portfolio management services, pre- and post-trade risk management services, or valuation services) or any other derivative works without the express written consent of CF Benchmarrks.

You agree not to analyze, reverse-engineer or disassemble any CF Benchmarks data and not to insert any code or product to manipulate the Website content in any way that affects any user’s experience. Unless CF Benchmarks gives you prior written permission, use of any Web browsers (other than generally available third-party browsers), engines, scripts, software, spiders, robots, avatars, agents, tools or other devices or mechanisms (such as crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or other technology) to navigate, access, copy in bulk, retrieve, harvest, index, search or analyse any portion of the Website is strictly prohibited.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of CF Benchmarks Ltd. Use and distribution of the CF Benchmarks data requires a license from CF Benchmarks or its authorized licensing agents.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained on this website is obtained by CF Benchmarks, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.

CF Benchmarks, nor its directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or implied, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the CF Benchmarks indices or the fitness or suitability of the same indices for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through CF Benchmarks indices is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by CF Benchmarks nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this website or links to this website.

CF Benchmarks and its respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors do not provide investment advice and nothing accessible through CF Benchmarks, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of any assets.

CF Benchmarks is a member of the Crypto Facilities group of companies which is in turn a member of the Payward, Inc. group of companies.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Kraken Exchange, a venue that facilitates the trading of cryptocurrencies. The Kraken Exchange is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.
  • Payward, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Staked, a venue that operates the block production nodes for decentralized PoS protocols on behalf of institutional investors. Staked.us is a source of input data for certain CF Benchmarks indices.

Please refer to the individual product family documentation for more information about applicable input data sources.

By clicking Accept, you consent to CF Benchmarks's use of cookies.

Visit Cookie Settings to learn how CF Benchmarks uses cookies and to adjust your preferences.